How to describe line of equation instead of autonumbering (2024)

Currently, I am using the align method in this way:

begin{align}
mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P}t{f_1(delta).f_2(delta)right} \
& = exp(mt) star left{frac{l}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-l^2/{4t})right} \
& = F_1 * F_2
end{align}

(sample code was found here)

This produces the following results (including an automatic equation line numbering system):

Would it be possible to replace those autonumbers with a description added in manually? I already know there is a way to remove the autonumbers, but I also would like to add some text to describe each line. Is this possible or too difficult to achieve?

align

share|improve this question

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

add a comment|

Currently, I am using the align method in this way:

begin{align}
mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P}t{f_1(delta).f_2(delta)right} \
& = exp(mt) star left{frac{l}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-l^2/{4t})right} \
& = F_1 * F_2
end{align}

(sample code was found here)

This produces the following results (including an automatic equation line numbering system):

align

share|improve this question

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

add a comment|

Currently, I am using the align method in this way:

begin{align}
mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P}t{f_1(delta).f_2(delta)right} \
& = exp(mt) star left{frac{l}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-l^2/{4t})right} \
& = F_1 * F_2
end{align}

(sample code was found here)

This produces the following results (including an automatic equation line numbering system):

align

share|improve this question

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

Currently, I am using the align method in this way:

begin{align}
mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P}t{f_1(delta).f_2(delta)right} \
& = exp(mt) star left{frac{l}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-l^2/{4t})right} \
& = F_1 * F_2
end{align}

(sample code was found here)

This produces the following results (including an automatic equation line numbering system):

align

share|improve this question

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

share|improve this question

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

share|improve this question

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

asked Jan 26 at 6:31

DaneologDaneolog

233

add a comment|

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

You can use tag*{<stuff>} to add descriptions without the surrounding (...) common to tags. If you want custom tags surrounded by (...), use tag{<stuff>}.

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } tag{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 tag{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

It's probably better to use a macro-like approach through something like

newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2}hspace{#1}}

which inserts a 2em space at the end of the tag*, effectively indenting it from the right-margin. This could separate it visually from other, regular tags, if needed.

A more tabular-like display of descriptions is possible if you just add another equation into the mix:

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } &
 text{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 &
 text{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

There will be a visible space between the equations to separate them.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 26 at 7:00

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

1

Hmm... is there any way to put it a little closer to the left instead of having it right-aligned to the entire page? It's a little nit-picky but it just looks kinda odd...
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:42

1

@Daneolog: Yes. tag and tag* are similar to equation numbering. In fact, if you use add a label, you can ref it later. If you're not using any label-refs with these descriptions, you can manhandle them slightly using something like newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2hspace{#1}}}. This puts a tag* with a default space of 2em on the right, effectively pushing it in 2em from the right margin. Use eqdesc[3em]{stuff} to change the default spacing. Is this more in line with what you're after?
–Werner
Jan 26 at 6:49

1

Hmm somewhat. I guess what I was technically going for was a more tabular format, similar to what begin{tabular} does here
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:56

1

This makes it look like the description is still left-oriented while on the right side of the equations.
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:57

1

@Daneolog: You can add another equation as your "description", encapsulating it inside text. I've added that as another option to my answer.
–Werner
Jan 26 at 7:01

|
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471921%2fhow-to-describe-line-of-equation-instead-of-autonumbering%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

You can use tag*{<stuff>} to add descriptions without the surrounding (...) common to tags. If you want custom tags surrounded by (...), use tag{<stuff>}.

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } tag{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 tag{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

It's probably better to use a macro-like approach through something like

newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2}hspace{#1}}

which inserts a 2em space at the end of the tag*, effectively indenting it from the right-margin. This could separate it visually from other, regular tags, if needed.

A more tabular-like display of descriptions is possible if you just add another equation into the mix:

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } &
 text{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 &
 text{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

There will be a visible space between the equations to separate them.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 26 at 7:00

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

1

Hmm... is there any way to put it a little closer to the left instead of having it right-aligned to the entire page? It's a little nit-picky but it just looks kinda odd...
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:42

1

@Daneolog: Yes. tag and tag* are similar to equation numbering. In fact, if you use add a label, you can ref it later. If you're not using any label-refs with these descriptions, you can manhandle them slightly using something like newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2hspace{#1}}}. This puts a tag* with a default space of 2em on the right, effectively pushing it in 2em from the right margin. Use eqdesc[3em]{stuff} to change the default spacing. Is this more in line with what you're after?
–Werner
Jan 26 at 6:49

1

Hmm somewhat. I guess what I was technically going for was a more tabular format, similar to what begin{tabular} does here
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:56

1

This makes it look like the description is still left-oriented while on the right side of the equations.
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:57

1

@Daneolog: You can add another equation as your "description", encapsulating it inside text. I've added that as another option to my answer.
–Werner
Jan 26 at 7:01

|
show 1 more comment

You can use tag*{<stuff>} to add descriptions without the surrounding (...) common to tags. If you want custom tags surrounded by (...), use tag{<stuff>}.

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } tag{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 tag{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

It's probably better to use a macro-like approach through something like

newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2}hspace{#1}}

which inserts a 2em space at the end of the tag*, effectively indenting it from the right-margin. This could separate it visually from other, regular tags, if needed.

A more tabular-like display of descriptions is possible if you just add another equation into the mix:

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } &
 text{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 &
 text{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

There will be a visible space between the equations to separate them.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 26 at 7:00

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

1

Hmm... is there any way to put it a little closer to the left instead of having it right-aligned to the entire page? It's a little nit-picky but it just looks kinda odd...
See Also
US Patent for Transfer learning with machine learning systems Patent (Patent # 12,061,991 issued August 13, 2024)
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:42

1

@Daneolog: Yes. tag and tag* are similar to equation numbering. In fact, if you use add a label, you can ref it later. If you're not using any label-refs with these descriptions, you can manhandle them slightly using something like newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2hspace{#1}}}. This puts a tag* with a default space of 2em on the right, effectively pushing it in 2em from the right margin. Use eqdesc[3em]{stuff} to change the default spacing. Is this more in line with what you're after?
–Werner
Jan 26 at 6:49

1

Hmm somewhat. I guess what I was technically going for was a more tabular format, similar to what begin{tabular} does here
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:56

1

This makes it look like the description is still left-oriented while on the right side of the equations.
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:57

1

@Daneolog: You can add another equation as your "description", encapsulating it inside text. I've added that as another option to my answer.
–Werner
Jan 26 at 7:01

|
show 1 more comment

You can use tag*{<stuff>} to add descriptions without the surrounding (...) common to tags. If you want custom tags surrounded by (...), use tag{<stuff>}.

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } tag{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 tag{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

It's probably better to use a macro-like approach through something like

newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2}hspace{#1}}

which inserts a 2em space at the end of the tag*, effectively indenting it from the right-margin. This could separate it visually from other, regular tags, if needed.

A more tabular-like display of descriptions is possible if you just add another equation into the mix:

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } &
 text{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 &
 text{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

There will be a visible space between the equations to separate them.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 26 at 7:00

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

You can use tag*{<stuff>} to add descriptions without the surrounding (...) common to tags. If you want custom tags surrounded by (...), use tag{<stuff>}.

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } tag{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 tag{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

It's probably better to use a macro-like approach through something like

newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2}hspace{#1}}

which inserts a 2em space at the end of the tag*, effectively indenting it from the right-margin. This could separate it visually from other, regular tags, if needed.

A more tabular-like display of descriptions is possible if you just add another equation into the mix:

documentclass{article}usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
 mathcal{P}(Z leq z) &= mathcal{P} t {f_1(delta).f_2(delta) } &
 text{description1} \
 &= exp(mt) star left{ frac{ell}{2sqrt{pi t^3}} exp(-ell^2/{4t}) right} \
 &= F_1 times F_2 &
 text{description2}
end{align*}
end{document}

There will be a visible space between the equations to separate them.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 26 at 7:00

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 26 at 7:00

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

answered Jan 26 at 6:39

WernerWerner

444k699791681

1

Hmm... is there any way to put it a little closer to the left instead of having it right-aligned to the entire page? It's a little nit-picky but it just looks kinda odd...
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:42

1

@Daneolog: Yes. tag and tag* are similar to equation numbering. In fact, if you use add a label, you can ref it later. If you're not using any label-refs with these descriptions, you can manhandle them slightly using something like newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2hspace{#1}}}. This puts a tag* with a default space of 2em on the right, effectively pushing it in 2em from the right margin. Use eqdesc[3em]{stuff} to change the default spacing. Is this more in line with what you're after?
–Werner
Jan 26 at 6:49

1

Hmm somewhat. I guess what I was technically going for was a more tabular format, similar to what begin{tabular} does here
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:56

1

This makes it look like the description is still left-oriented while on the right side of the equations.
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:57

1

@Daneolog: You can add another equation as your "description", encapsulating it inside text. I've added that as another option to my answer.
–Werner
Jan 26 at 7:01

|
show 1 more comment

1

Hmm... is there any way to put it a little closer to the left instead of having it right-aligned to the entire page? It's a little nit-picky but it just looks kinda odd...
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:42

1

@Daneolog: Yes. tag and tag* are similar to equation numbering. In fact, if you use add a label, you can ref it later. If you're not using any label-refs with these descriptions, you can manhandle them slightly using something like newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2hspace{#1}}}. This puts a tag* with a default space of 2em on the right, effectively pushing it in 2em from the right margin. Use eqdesc[3em]{stuff} to change the default spacing. Is this more in line with what you're after?
–Werner
Jan 26 at 6:49

1

Hmm somewhat. I guess what I was technically going for was a more tabular format, similar to what begin{tabular} does here
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:56

1

This makes it look like the description is still left-oriented while on the right side of the equations.
–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:57

1

@Daneolog: You can add another equation as your "description", encapsulating it inside text. I've added that as another option to my answer.
–Werner
Jan 26 at 7:01

Hmm... is there any way to put it a little closer to the left instead of having it right-aligned to the entire page? It's a little nit-picky but it just looks kinda odd...

–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:42

Hmm... is there any way to put it a little closer to the left instead of having it right-aligned to the entire page? It's a little nit-picky but it just looks kinda odd...

–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:42

@Daneolog: Yes. tag and tag* are similar to equation numbering. In fact, if you use add a label, you can ref it later. If you're not using any label-refs with these descriptions, you can manhandle them slightly using something like newcommand{eqdesc}[2][2em]{tag*{#2hspace{#1}}}. This puts a tag* with a default space of 2em on the right, effectively pushing it in 2em from the right margin. Use eqdesc[3em]{stuff} to change the default spacing. Is this more in line with what you're after?

–Werner
Jan 26 at 6:49

Hmm somewhat. I guess what I was technically going for was a more tabular format, similar to what begin{tabular} does here

–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:56

Hmm somewhat. I guess what I was technically going for was a more tabular format, similar to what begin{tabular} does here

–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:56

This makes it look like the description is still left-oriented while on the right side of the equations.

–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:57

This makes it look like the description is still left-oriented while on the right side of the equations.

–Daneolog
Jan 26 at 6:57

@Daneolog: You can add another equation as your "description", encapsulating it inside text. I've added that as another option to my answer.

–Werner
Jan 26 at 7:01

@Daneolog: You can add another equation as your "description", encapsulating it inside text. I've added that as another option to my answer.

–Werner
Jan 26 at 7:01

|
show 1 more comment

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

-February 18, 2019

');i++;if (r < relatedTitles.length - 1) {r++;} else {r = 0;}}document.write('

');relatedUrls.splice(0,relatedUrls.length);thumburl.splice(0,thumburl.length);relatedTitles.splice(0,relatedTitles.length);}//]]>

How to describe line of equation instead of autonumbering (2024)

FAQs

How to stop equations from being numbered in LaTeX? ›

You can use \notag or \nonumber to prevent individual equations from being numbered, and \tag{} can be used to override the usual equation number with your own symbol instead (or to add an equation tag even when automatic numbering is off).

Learn More ›

How do you write the equation of a line in different forms? ›

The equation of a straight line can be found using different formulas: Point-slope form: y - y₁ = m (x - x₁) Two-point form: y - y₁ = [(y₂-y₁) / (x₂-x₁)] (x - x₁)

Keep Reading ›

How to determine the equation of a line? ›

Explanation: These lines are written in the form y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. We know from the question that our slope is 3 and our y-intercept is –5, so plugging these values in we get the equation of our line to be y = 3x – 5.

Discover More ›

How to write the equation of each line? ›

To Write an Equation of a Line

If given slope and y-intercept, use slope–intercept form y=mx+b.
If given slope and a point, use point–slope form y−y1=m(x−x1).
If given two points, use point–slope form y−y1=m(x−x1).

Mar 10, 2024

Find Out More ›

How to write equations in LaTeX without numbering? ›

To get only one equation number, use \notag on lines not to be numbered. To get no equation numbers, use the align* environment. To get an equation number using the align* environment, use e.g. \tag{2.1} to put the number in explicitly.

See Details ›

How do I get rid of numbering in LaTeX? ›

LaTeX. In LaTeX, unnumbered sections, subsections, and so forth can be produced by adding an asterisk to the sectioning command, as in this example.

Discover More Details ›

How do you write an equation of a line in standard form? ›

The equation of a line in standard form is Ax+By=C, where A, B, and C are integers, A>0, and both A and B are not zero.

Find Out More ›

How do you write an equation for a specific line? ›

How to Find the Equation of a Line from Two Points

Find the slope using the slope formula. ...
Use the slope and one of the points to solve for the y-intercept (b). ...
Once you know the value for m and the value for b, you can plug these into the slope-intercept form of a line (y = mx + b) to get the equation for the line.

View Details ›

What are examples of line equations? ›

Some of the examples of linear equations are 2x – 3 = 0, 2y = 8, m + 1 = 0, x/2 = 3, x + y = 2, 3x – y + z = 3. In this article, we are going to discuss the definition of linear equations, standard form for linear equation in one variable, two variables, three variables and their examples with complete explanation.

Show Me More ›

What are the 3 methods in finding the equation of a line? ›

Method 1: Constructing a Table of Values.
Method 2: Using the Slope and y-intercept (y = mx+b)
Method 3: Connecting the x and y-Intercepts.

Nov 17, 2020

Read The Full Story ›

How is the equation of a line written? ›

Definition. The equation of a straight line is y=mx+c y = m x + c m is the gradient and c is the height at which the line crosses the y -axis, also known as the y -intercept.

Know More ›

What are the three forms of a linear equation? ›

There are three major forms of linear equations: point-slope form, standard form, and slope-intercept form. We review all three in this article.

Get More Info Here ›

How do you turn an equation into a line? ›

Graphing a Line from an Equation in Standard Form: Example #1

Step 1: Find the x-intercept. Because the x-intercept has a y coordinate of 0, plug zero in for y and solve for x. ...
Step 2: Find the y-intercept. ...
Step 3: Plot the x-intercept and y-intercept points on the graph. ...
Step 4: Draw a line through the two points.

Read The Full Story ›

How to change the numbering of an equation in LaTeX? ›

How do you turn off the equation auto numbering in LaTeX? It depends on what you want. You can use \[\] or \begin{equation*}\end{equation*} or \begin{align*}\end{align*} to get unnumbered math environments. With align you can suppress an number on a line using \notag.

See Details ›

How do you hide equation numbering in LaTeX align? ›

Use \begin{align*} and \end{align*} to switch off numbering entirely.

How do you get rid of a number in an equation? ›

To Remove the Number in Front of x

Move all the terms that only consists of numbers to the right hand side. Remember to change + to − and − to + on the terms that move across the equal sign.
Move all the terms with the unknown x to the left side of the equation. ...
Simplify both sides.

How do you proof without numbering in LaTeX? ›

Using the default configuration, LaTeX will number proofs (e.g. Definition 1, Theorem 2, Proof 3), which is probably not what you want. To disable proof numbering with LaTeX, you have to : Add "proof" to proof_latex_notheorem . Sphinx will define a proof::proof directive, but LaTeX will not define a proof environment.

Get More Info ›

How to describe line of equation instead of autonumbering (2024)

1 Answer 1

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Post as a guest

1 Answer 1

1 Answer 1

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Post as a guest

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

FAQs

How to stop equations from being numbered in LaTeX? ›

How is the equation of a line written? ›

1 Answer
1

1 Answer
1

1 Answer
1